Allan Loder - Portfolio > DLS Quality Standards Review Form
DLS Quality Standards Review Form


DLS Quality Standards
Course Review Rubric



Course Number:    Course Title:

Course Developer: First Time Developer:  


Contract Date:    Contract in File: Target Date:   Sign-off Date:

I. General Overview and Introduction

The overall design of the course, navigational information, as well as course, instructor and student information are made transparent to the student at the beginning of the course.
 

Rating:     N/A - Not Applicable     0 = Not Included     1 = Poor     5 = Good     8 = Very Good     10 = Excellent
Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
I.1 The introduction by the instructor is appropriate. /10
3
I.2
Students are asked to introduce themselves to the class, and a discussion forum is set up for this purpose. /10

3
I.3
A sample course schedule is included and properly formatted (15 week semester, evaluation, due dates). /10
2
I.4
The Course Information page (a.k.a. syllabus) is included and properly formatted. /10


3
I.5
Expectations with regard to discussion postings and email are clearly stated. /10
3
I.6
Navigational instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand. /10

3

II. Learning Objectives (Competencies, PIRS)

Learning objectives are clearly defined and explained. They assist the student to focus learning activities.

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
II.1 The learning objectives for the course describe outcomes that are measurable. /10
3
II.2
The learning objectives for the course address content mastery, critical thinking skills and core learning skills. /10

3
II.3
The learning objectives for the course adhere to provincial course guidelines (PIRS). /10

3
II.4 The learning objectives for the course are clearly stated and students are given clear instructions on how to meet these objectives (i.e., Learning Activities page is included for each unit). /10
3
II.5
The learning objectives for each module/unit are present, and are consistent with the content and activities for that module/unit. /10


3

III. Instructional Materials and Resources

Instructional materials are sufficiently comprehensive to achieve learning objectives

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
III.1 A rubric is included for each assessment tool. /10
3
III.2
Instructional materials are presented in a format appropriate to the online environment, and are easily accessible to and usable by the student. /10

3
III.3
The instructional materials are presented to the student in manageable segments (e.g., no more than 3 continuous screens of content). /10

3
III.4
The instructional materials are presented to the student in a logical progression. /10
3
III.5 Supporting graphics are of good quality. /10 3
III.6
The instructional materials are free from typographical and grammatical errors. /10 3
III.7
All resources and materials used in the online course are appropriately cited (i.e., respectful of copyright laws). /10 3
III.8
Web pages have links that are self-describing and meaningful, and they open in a seperate window. /10


3

IV. Assessment and Measurement

The assessment strategies are designed to measure student progress by reference to stated learning objectives.

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
IV.1 The methods/tools of assessment used are consistent with the content and activities of the course module/unit. /10
3
IV.2
The methods/tools of assessment used are appropriate for measuring how well the student has achieved the stated learning objectives. /10

3
IV.3
The grading policy is transparent and easy to understand. /10

2
IV.4
Assessment and measurement strategies provide feedback to the student. /10
3
IV.5 The assessment/evaluation methods used in the course complies with the PIRS outline. /10 2
IV.6
“Self-assessment” tools are provided for quick student feedback. /10


3

V. Learner Interaction

The effective design of instructor-to-student, student-to- student and student-to-content interaction is essential to student motivation, intellectual commitment and personal development.

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
V.1
Learning activities foster instructor-to-student interaction. /10

3
V.2
Learning activities foster student-to-student interaction. /10

3
V.3
Learning activities foster student-to-content interaction. /10
3
V.4 Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability (turn-around time for email, grade posting, etc.). /10 2
V.5
The requirements for course interaction are clearly articulated. /10 3

VI. Course Technology

To enhance student learning, course technology enriches instruction and fosters student interactivity.

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
VI.1 The tools and media support the learning objectives of the course and are integrated with texts and lesson assignments. /10
3
VI.2
Technologies required for this course are either provided or easily downloadable. /10

2
VI.3
Instructions on how to access resources at a distance are sufficient and easy to understand. /10
2
VI.4 Low bandwidth considerations are taken into account. /10 2

VII. Course Components

The standard course components are included.

Specific Review Standards:
Rating
Notes
Points
VII.1
The course files are well organized (i.e., use of appropriate directory structure). /10

3
VII.2
Files and folders are properly named. /10
3

                  Total:

Comments and/or Recommendations:

Reviewed from: Date Reviewed:   Reviewed by: