jon robinson [symbol] utoronto ca
Welcome
I now work as a lawyer in Toronto, but I continue to work on
medieval topics that fall, roughly, within the ambit of legal and
political thought. Before turning to law, I completed a Ph.D. at the
University of Toronto in medieval studies and worked for time in
academia. This website serves as repository of the work I have done
and gives a sense of where some of my current research interests lie.
My pre-modern research interests focus especially on the
intersection or legal and political thought in the thirteenth and
fourteenth centuries.
Following my doctoral work at
the Centre for Medieval Studies at
the University of
Toronto, I spent two years as a post-doctoral researcher at
the School of Canon Law
at The Catholic University of
America. At CUA, I expanded on my doctoral work in the history
of the mendicant poverty controversy, particularly in relation to
exploring what the texts of the controversy can tell us about how
the origin and nature of property rights were understood. At the
same time, I began to explore the medieval jurists' contribution to
the concept of individual rights; Bartolus of Saxoferrato, the
so-called iuris monarcha, was the nominal anchor of this
new project, but it has since expanded into a more general
exploration of thirteenth- and fourteenth-century developments.
More generally, I have become interested in the relationship of
individual rights (natural and positive) to natural and positive
law.
Finally, if the 'location' of this webpage seems surprising, it is
to be explained by the fact that the University of Toronto has not
seen fit to complain about this page despite my increasingly tenuous
connection to the University, and I'd like it to remain as a minor
'island of stability' among the short half-lives
of many other web pages.
This is the one you want to bring with you to the beach and buy for
all your friends and family:
Published articles and book chapters
Note that I now maintain e-prints (etc.) on the
Open Science Framework, which is a proper open access respository (unlike social networking sites like
Academia.edu, which should be avoided). However, for now (at
least) what is available there is but a subset of what can be found
here.
- 'Townshend v Townshend and Buttar v Buttar: Gifts, Intentions, and Exclusions', Canadian Journal of Family Law 30.2 (2017): 265–287.
- (with John Kilcullen) 'Medieval Political Thought', The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/medieval-political/. NB: John Kilcullen wrote the original version of this article, which he last updated in 2010; I substantively revised it for the summer 2017 edition, and now maintain it. Please contact me with references to and off- or e-prints of current and future scholarship!
[ forthcoming archived URL ] [ BibTeX ]
- 'Ockham, the Sanctity of Rights, and the Canonists',
Bulletin of Medieval Canon Law
31 (2014): 147–204
[ paper ]
[ BibTeX ]
-
'Walter Chatton on Dominium,
History of Political Thought
35.4 (2014): 656–682
[ paper ]
[ BibTeX ]
-
'Property Rights in the Shift from "Community" to "Michaelist"',
Rivista internazionale di diritto comune 22 (2011):
141–181
[ paper ]
[ BibTeX ]
-
'Innocent IV, John XXII, and the Michaelists on Corporate Poverty', in
Poverty and Prosperity in the Middle Ages and Renaissance, edited by
Anne Scott and Cynthia Kosso, Arizona Studies in the Middle Ages and the
Renaissance 19 (Turnhout: Brepols, 2012), 197–224
[
paper ]
[ BibTeX ]
-
'William of Ockham on the Right to (Ab-)Use Goods',
Franciscan Studies 67 (2009): 347–374
[
paper ]
[ BibTeX ]
-
'Qui praedicat periculum in illo peribit: William of
St-Amour's Anti-Mendicant Sermons', in
Weapons of Mass Instruction: Secular and Religious Institutions
Teaching the World, Proceedings of a St. Michael's College
Symposium (25-26 November 2005), edited by Joseph Goering, Francesco
Guardiani, and Giulio Silano (Ottawa:
Legas, 2008), 51-63
[ paper
]
[ BibTeX ]
Reviews
Some book reviews (written in markdown):
-
Review of Riccardo Saccenti, Debating Medieval Natural Law: A
Survey (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2016),
for The Medieval Review 17.12.12
(also here)
-
Review of Eckart Schütrumpf, The Earliest Translations of
Aristotle's "Politics" and the Creation of Political
Terminology, Morphomata Lectures Cologne 8 (Paderborn: Wilhelm
Fink, 2014), for The Medieval Review 15.11.19
(also
here)
-
Review of C. H. Lawrence, The Friars: The Impact of the
Mendicant Orders on Medieval Society Revised paperback
edition (New York: I. B. Tauris, 2013), for
The Medieval Review 14.04.22
(also
here)
-
Review of Jussi Varkemaa, Conrad Summenhart's Theory of
Individual Rights (Leiden: Brill, 2012), for The Medieval Review
12.11.16 (also here)
-
Review of James Blythe, The Life and Works of Tolomeo
Fiadoni (Ptolemy of Lucca) and The Worldview and
Thought of Tolomeo Fiadoni (Ptolemy of Lucca) (Turnhout:
Brepols, 2009), for The Medieval Review
11.04.06 (also here)
Please note that the above articles, essays, and reviews (in the form
they appear here) are licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License
. But I am probably willing to waive these restrictions for
certain creative repurposing, so just ask. (I can only imagine how many requests there will be….)
In what I now recognize as an example of structured
procrastination, over the last few years I have translated a few
texts pertaining to the mendicant poverty controversy of thirteenth
and fourteenth centuries. I have since then widened my perspective
some, with the goal of providing a series of texts that may be used in
the classroom free of charge. However, I encourage students who wish
to use anything from this website to speak to their professors
beforehand.
I have aimed to provide literal rather than elegant translations,
much like (one gets the sense) the original authors themselves aimed
for clarity of expression over elegance. However, errors both small
and large are no doubt present. If you notice any, I would appreciate
it if you could let me know, no matter how trivial they may be.
These texts undergo sporadic revision at irregular
intervals. Most of the time I remember to increment the 'version' number
found at the bottom of the first page—so you can easily check
which version is the newest—but I do forget occasionally. If
the version number on the .pdf does not match the number list below,
please contact me for the more recent version (and I can fix my
mistake!).
Finally, those interested in other translations pertaining
to the poverty controversy should visit the website of Professor John
Kilcullen, first for translations of some of the relevant papal
bulls, and for translations of some of William
of Ockham's writings (and indeed much, much more).
-
Bonagratia of Bergamo, A Tract on the Poverty of Christ and the
Apostles
[rev. 1.3b]
-
Bonaventure of Bagnoregio
-
A Disputed Question on Evangelical Poverty as it
Concerns Renunciation (De perfectione evangelica
q. 2 a. 1 — De paupertate quoad abrenuntiationem)
[rev. 1.4a]
-
A Disputed Question on Evangelical Poverty as it
Concerns Mendicancy (De perfectione evangelica q. 2
a. 2 — De paupertate quoad mendicitatem) [rev. 1.7a]
- Declaration of the 'Community' Regarding the Matter of Poor
Use (ca. 1309–1310; 'Circa materiam') [rev. 1.0]
-
Michael of Cesena, The Shorter Appeal
(Appellatio abbreviata, extracta de Appellatione prolixa) [rev. 1.10a]
- This translation is based on Gál and Flood's edition
(1996) of the Chronica by 'Nicholas the Minorite' (perhaps
Nicholas of Freising), who compiled a large dossier of texts related
to the controversy between the Michaelists and Pope John XXII. The
text is available from the Franciscan Institute; some readers might be
interested in a small list of minor corrections
I have compiled.
- Peter (of John) Olivi, On Poverty and Revenue
(Quaestiones de perfectione evangelica, q. 16) [rev. 1.1a]
- Walter Chatton, 'Whether Christ Merited by Lacking All Lordship
to Temporal Things' (Reportatio 3.16.un) [rev. 1.1a]
-
William of Saint-Amour
-
[William of St-Amour et al.[?], A List of Sententiae Taken
from the Eternal Gospel by Professors of the University of
Paris [rev. 1.1]
-
A Disputed Question on the Quantity of Alms (De
quantitate eleemosynae) [rev. 1.3a]
-
A Disputed Question on Able-Bodied Begging (De valido
mendicante) [rev. 1.3a]
-
'He Who Loves Danger...' (a sermon beginning 'Qui amat
periculum') [rev. 1.5a]
-
A Brief Tract on the Dangers of the Last Days
(Tractatus brevis de periculis novissimorum temporum ex
scripturis sumptus) [rev. 2.0a]
-
Papal Bulls (all pertaining to the mendicant poverty controversy)
- Pope Gregory IX, Quo elongati (Latin and English)
[rev. 1.1]
- Pope Martin IV, Exultantes in Domino (Latin and English) [rev. 1.1]
-
Pope John XXII
- Quia nonnunquam
(Latin and English)
[rev. 1.4a]
- Ad conditorem canonum (both versions,
Latin and English) [rev. 1.1e]
Of course, not everything has to be about mendicants and poverty....
-
Bartolus of Saxoferrato
-
Huguccio Pisanus, On ius naturale (excerpts from his Summa decretorum)
- Peter Lombard, On Penance (Sentences 4 D. 14
cc. 74(1)–78(5))
[rev. 1.3]
- Tolomeo Fiadoni (Ptolemy of Lucca)(?), On the Origin,
Translation, and State of the Roman Empire
[rev. 1.0]
-
William of Ockham, Eight Questions on the Power of the
Pope.
Note: I have completed a draft translation of the full text, which I am in the process of revising. As it is in a state of flux, I have decided against posting any more drafts. Please contact me if you would like to see a draft of the full text.
-
Q.1: Whether the same person can have both supreme spiritual and
secular power.
- Q.2: Whether supreme secular power has any special property
unto itself directly from God.
-
Q.3: Whether it pertains, by Christ's institution, to the
pope and Roman Church to entrust temporal jurisdictions to
secular rulers.
Note: An earlier translation
exists; see A.S. McGrade and J. Kilcullen,
eds., A Letter to the Friars Minor and Other
Writings (Cambridge, 1995)
- Q.4: Whether the king or emperor of the Romans has full
administration because his power comes directly from God.
-
Q.5: Whether the king or emperor gains, via election, full
administration because his power comes immediately from God.
- Q.6: Whether a hereditary king is subject to the person who
crowns him.
- Q.7: Whether a king who succeeds hereditarily is subject in
some way to the person who crowns him.
- Q.8: Whether a canonical election of the princes-electors
would give to the one elected as king of the Romans, by virtue
of the election,
as much as legitimate succession gives
to a king succeeding hereditarily.
Please note that the above translations are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
(I am slowly updating the files themselves to reflect this.)
My new project, loosely speaking:
-
Bartolus of Saxoferrato, Liber decisionum minoricarum [rev. 1.6]
(Note: this text will
be under considerable development for some time. Pay attention to
the version number, and exercise considerable caution if you use
it! — and of course I am happy to provide a more up-to-date
version if you contact me.)
Below are a few texts, so far mainly only a few papal bulls, which I
have found useful over the years to have lying around. I include them here
because they are not already available online and I know I wish they had
been. The bulls following are based on the versions found in the
Bullarium franciscanum (Rome, 1759–1904). The
Constitutiones are based on the versions found in Analecta
franciscana 13 and 17, and the document is (as of May 2011) under
active development.
- A partial comparison of the Franciscan Constitutiones
generales (1260–1325). (Chapters 1–3) [rev. 1.2]
-
Innocent IV,
Nimis iniqua, 21 July 1245
-
Innocent IV,
Ordinem vestrum, 14 November 1245 (No longer
maintained; see translations above.)
-
Innocent IV,
Quanto studiosius, 19 August 1247 (See
translations above.)
-
Martin IV,
Exultantes in Domino, 18 January 1283 (See
translations above.)
Please note that, excluding the text of Bartolus, the other texts in
this section may be used pretty much as you please — otherwise
known as a
Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Over the years I have found it handy to have plain text versions
of the texts of the Corpus iuris civilis and (in part)
the Corpus iuris canonici. They are no substitute for the
standard critical editions, of course, but they are useful for many
different reasons. This is especially true in the field of medieval
law because of the way medieval jurists cited these texts. The
ability to search and manipulate these texts has proven tremendously
valuable. I have decided to make the versions I have used available
on GitHub, which you can access by
following this
link. If you are familiar
with Git, you can clone the
repository:
git clone https://github.com/jonwrobinson/corpus-iuris
Others can download the set of files as a regular ZIP archive. (It
can be found on GitHub as
well: the link
again.) Interested users of these texts should note that,
depending on what I happen to be doing day-to-day, individual files
may undergo rapid changes. (This is in fact the reason for using Git
in the first place: it would be much too tedious to host up-to-date
versions here.) Changes to the text itself are almost always very
minor, except when removing some of the weird cruft that has survived
the conversion from (sometimes spotty) HTML to the plain text versions
I am maintaining, but the way they are organized does evolve. I am
also very eager to hear about other texts to add to the collection if
you happen to know of any.
If you are interested in contributing, Git makes it really easy for
people to collaborate on a project and 'track changes'. For so large
a collection of texts, this is useful because everyone can make minor
edits that won't get lost or overwritten. And if you are not
interested in contributing, you are advised to check back periodically
and grab the latest version.
(If you have read this far...)
I try to use
free software exclusively, and I encourage you to do so as
well.
The files found on this website were written using the versatile
text editor, Gnu Emacs, which is good for
just about
everything.
Plain text documents documents are formatted in
Markdown, which is a hardly noticeable markup
language desgined for easy conversion to other formats (e.g.,
HTML).
For more complex tasks, I use
LaTeX,
an extremely stable document markup language for
TeX,
a typesetting program (there are three common programs nowadays:
pdfTeX,
XeTeX, or
LuaTeX). All
PDFs created on this site were formatted using LaTeX, as was my book
(with LuaTeX as the underlying engine). I encourage you to try it for
yourselves and divest yourself of the limitations a traditional word
processor
forces upon you.
For what it's worth, I
use GNU/Linux, usually a form
of Ubuntu because
it is free(!) and easy to use, and because I like
the Apt
system of package management. My preference is to maximize screen
usage, avoid GUIs, and minimize the need for a mouse. I regularly use
the following programs:
- Openbox: a lightweight, but highly customizable window manager
- tmux:
a terminal multiplexer, usually run in
a GNOME
terminal emulator, which commonly 'contains':
-
Tilda: because it is cool and convenient
- MPD:
for music (made infinitely more useful by this
goodsong script)
- PDF:
MuPDF and
zathura
- Conkeror:
a keyboard-driven, highly-customizable, and highly-extensible web browser
- Other useful odds and ends include:
conky,
dmenu
dzen2, and
tint2.