Inversions

 

Pericentric inversions

Paracentric inversions

 

 

Epidemiology and Etiology:

·         Estimates of frequency:

·         Pericentric – 0.12 to 0.7%

·         Paracentric – 0.1 to 0.5%

·         May be the most common form of chromosomal polymorphism found in nature

·         Many small inversions may remain undetected

·         Most are inherited (85-90%)

·         Mechanisms of formation:

·         NAHR:

·         Recombination between inverted homologous sequences on the same chromosome           

·         Terminology:

·         Simple inversion

·         2-break event involving just one chromosome

·         Complex inversion

·         Coexists with another rearrangement in the same chromosome

·         Pericentric inversion

·         Inverted segment includes centromere

·         Paracentric inversion

·         Inverted segment does not include centromere

·         Nomenclature:

·         Ex. 46,XX,inv(3)(p25q21)

·         Inversions with breakpoints within the heterochromatic regions of chromosomes 1, 9, 16, and Y are frequently seen

·         Regarded as variants, not abnormal

·         Other apparently benign recurring pericentric inversions with breakpoints very near the centromere:

·         2, 3, 10, and Y

·         Preferential sites of pericentric inversions:

·         Inv(2)(p11.2q13) is most common inversion not involving centromeric heterochromatin

·         2p13, 2q21

·         5p13, 5q31

·         6q21

·         10q22

·         12q13

·         Other recurrent pericentric inversions:

·         inv(3)(p25q21)

·         inv(4)(p14q35)

·         inv(10)(p11q25)

·         inv(13)(p13q21)

·         inv(21)(p12q21.1)

·         Preferential sites of paracentric inversions:

·         Factor VIII gene

·         Hemophilia A can be caused by recombination between inverted homologous sequences

·         Genesis of imbalanced gametes:

·         One (or an uneven number of) crossover(s) within the inversion loop (resulting in homosynapsis), between a chromatid of the normal homolog and a chromatid of the inversion chromosome leads to the production of two complementary recombinant chromosomes:

·         One with a duplication of the distal segment of the short arm and a deletion of the distal segment of the long arm

·         One with a deletion of the distal segment of the short arm and a duplication of the distal segment of the long arm

·         Typically only one of these (the least monosomic) is viable if any

·         Small inversions may not be able to form an inversion loop and instead will “balloon out” (asynapsis) or lie adjacent but unmatched (heterosynapsis), and recombination cannot occur in this situation

·         If both breakpoints are in G-light regions, homosynapsis is more likely than if one or both breakpoints are in a G-dark band

·         Sperm studies show that longer inversions are more likely to form recombinants (13-38%) while short inversions do not form recombinants

·         However, some inversions seem to suppress recombinants (ex. inv(1)(p31q12)

·          

 

Common sites:

·          

 

Gross features:

·          

 

Histologic features:

·          

 

Immunophenotype:

Marker:

Sensitivity:

Specificity:

 

 

 

 

Molecular features:

·          

 

Other features:

·         In most cases does not perturb the smooth running of the genome

·         Xq breakpoint within the critical regions can cause gonadal insufficiency

·         Rarely breakpoint occurs within a gene and is directly pathogenic

·         De novo inversion in a fetus/child:

·         9.4% overall risk of serious congenital anomaly (amniotic fluid) (Warburton 1991)

·         Submicroscopic deletion may be generated during the formation of a paracentric inversion (risk is close to negligible)

·         However, Angelman/Prader-Wili region should be checked for breakpoints near this region in proximal 15q

·         Mosaic inversions:

·         Parent:

·         Rare

·          

 

References:

·         Gardner RJM, Sutherland GR. Chromosome abnormalities and genetic counseling. Oxford University Press; 2004.

·         Warburton D. De novo balanced chromosome rearrangements and extra marker chromosomes identified at prenatal diagnosis: clinical significance and distribution of breakpoints. Am J Hum Genet. 1991;49(5):995-1013.