AML with inv(16)(p13.1q22) or
t(16;16)(p13.1;q22)
aka
Epidemiology and Etiology:
·
5-8% of cytogenetically abnormal AML
·
95% are inversion, 5% are translocation
·
younger patients predominantly
·
vast majority are de novo rather than treatment
related (< 5%)
Common sites:
·
Gross features:
·
Histologic features:
·
majority are
·
also seen in other M4 and M5
·
monocytic and granulocytic differentiation usually
·
blasts often at 20% or lower
·
characteristically abnormal eosinophil
component in the BM (most cases)
·
variable in number (usually increased, but
sometimes < 5%)
·
all stages of differentiation
·
striking immature eosinophilic
granules evident at the promyelocyte and myelocyte stages mainly
·
larger
·
purple-violet
·
obscure the cell morphology in some cells
·
nuclear hyposegmentation
in mature eosinophils maybe
·
naphthol-
·
neutrophils in BM usually sparse
·
PB no different than other cases of AMML
·
Eos not usually increased
·
monocytoid by NSE stain and flow
·
lobated blasts
·
more strongly CD45
·
Immunophenotype:
Marker: |
Sensitivity: |
Specificity: |
|
|
|
Molecular features:
·
CBFB/MYH11 fusion transcripts
·
involve the core binding factor Beta gene
(CBF-Beta) on 16q22 and the smooth muscle heavy chain (MYH11) on 16p13.1
·
CBFB is a transcription factor that binds
to enhancers of T-cell receptor, cytokine genes, and others
·
Heterodimerizes with CBFA (gene product of RUNX1)
·
Subtle rearrangements that may be
overlooked on G-banding
·
Additional abnormalities of the inv(16), often translocations, are not uncommon
·
can be quantitated by Q-RT-
·
secondary genetic changes (40%):
·
·
+22, +8 (10-15% each)
·
Trisomy 22 is quite specific for inv(16)
patients
·
Trisomy 8 is not specific
·
Del(7)(q) (6%)
·
+21 (~5%)
·
t(9;22)(q34;q11.2) (rare, usually seen in
blast phase of CML)
·
Other features:
·
Favourable prognosis (irrespective of additional
changes):
·
longer complete remissions when treated
with high dose cytarabine in the consolidation phase
·
older patients have decreased survival
·
those with
·
those with +22 have been reported to have
improved outcome
·
References:
·
Swerdlow. WHO
Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic
and Lymphoid Tissue. 4th ed. WHO Publications; 2008.
·
Heim & Mitelman. Cancer Cytogenetics
(2009)