(no paper
is attached to this workshop)
This article examined the
critique that social work curriculum, taught through an Anti-oppressive
approach (AOP), excludes mental health from its critical analysis.
I attempted to fill the gap of existing literature as well as enhance
critical analysis by weaving in a reflexive thread, which depicts
my experience as a Mad student, Mad lecturer and a Mad citizen.
My experience as a Mad social work student has greatly informed
my critique of the dominant discourse with respect to social work
practice with the Mad community. While learning about practice perspectives
from an anti-oppression framework I have often found myself confused
as to why the knowledge and experience of the Mad person is not
valued within the classroom or the current literature. This article
had provided support, both with existing literature and reflexive
knowledge, to my assertion that change is needed in the way in which
social work curriculum talks about, presents and analyzes madness.
The article reviewed the contradictory practice in seemingly critical
social work curriculum of heavily relying on the biomedical discourse
and in response offered space for a discussion on how social work
could be a more effective ally to the Mad community. Through this
article I attempted to address the current discrimination against
Mad people that social work curriculum continues to perpetuate. |