For the Topics In Material Culture course, the first term assignment requires the development of a personal artifact analysis methodology, which is to be applied to an object. The result of the application will be a thesis statement for a research paper and website to be produced next term. To navigate throughout the site and learn more, follow the main navigation links at the bottom of the page, to the main categories of this website.

This is the continuation of the application of my artifact analysis methodology on a single musical box, shown below. This analysis is divided among multiple pages due to overall length and ease of comprehension. To view the methodology produced, follow the Methodology button below. To continue with this application, follow the Part 3 button.

Part 2: Classification

Classification Operation:

This aspect of the artifact analysis only truly works when applied to numerous artifacts at once, to properly classify them in relation to each other. The classifications listed here, are based on a simultaneous analysis done of four different musical boxes of different forms and materials, as shown here:

Before attempting to define what differentiates these musical boxes, a listing of the similarities is required. All four contain a hidden musical component that is wound by a metal key protruding outside the exterior shape.

What differentiates them? What are the dissimilar attributes? The bear is differentiated from the other musical boxes because: It doesn't need to be turned upside down to wind. The winding key is on the back, not the bottom. It moves, like the swans and tree, it is not stationary. It has no secondary function It gives an impression of age and is old-fashioned - like the box.