Applied Physics Letters, 10 March 2008
Appl. Phys. Lett. 92, 103106 (2008) (3 pages)
©2008 American Institute of Physics. All rights reserved. Rightslink - Permissions for ReusePermissions for ReuseAbout Rightslink

Up: Issue Table of Contents
Go to: Previous Article | Next Article
Other formats: HTML (smaller files) | PDF (326 kB)

Tuning coherent radiative thermal conductance in multilayer photonic crystals

Wah Tung Lau,1 (a)Jung-Tsung Shen,1 Georgios Veronis,1 Shanhui Fan,1 (b)and Paul V. Braun2

1Ginzton Laboratory, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305, USA
2Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

(Received: 1 January 2008; accepted: 11 February 2008; published online: 10 March 2008)

We consider coherent radiative thermal conductance of a multilayer photonic crystal. The crystal consists of alternating layers of lossless dielectric slabs and vacuum, where heat is conducted only through photons. We show that such a structure can have thermal conductance below vacuum over the entire high temperature range due to the presence of partial band gap in most of the frequency range, as well as the suppression of evanescent tunneling between slabs at higher frequencies. The thermal conductance of this structure is highly tunable by varying the thickness of the vacuum layers. ©2008 American Institute of Physics


Contents

Recently, there has been significant interest in exploring coherent thermal transport, especially for devices at nanoscale.1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 To demonstrate coherent thermal transport, most experiments have exploited phonons as the heat carriers and were typically performed at low temperature in order to avoid strong phonon-phonon interaction in solids.1,2,3,4,5,6 On the other hand, interaction between photons is much weaker. It would therefore be of great interest as well to design structures that allow exploration of photon-based coherent thermal transport, which should occur at higher temperatures.

In this letter, we consider the thermal conductance of a multilayer photonic crystal, consisting of alternating layers of dielectric and vacuum (Fig. 1). In this structure, since neither electrons nor phonons can propagate through the vacuum layers, the thermal transport along the direction of periodicity should dominantly be due to photons. With the use of transparent materials as the dielectric, the absorption length of photons can be made to be much longer than the period of the crystal and, hence, the heat conduction process should be coherent over significant distances. Moreover, unlike one-dimensional nanowire systems that have been extensively used to study coherent thermal transport,7,8 here, the photon modes are not confined to a narrow channel and, hence, the photonic band structure in full three dimensions needs to be considered. Our analysis here shows that the thermal conduction properties of this system are significantly influenced by the band structure. In particular, the frequencies of the first band gap in many cases define a characteristic temperature. At far below this characteristic temperature, the conductance of the crystal is the same as that of an equivalent uniform medium with an effective average index related to the dielectric constants of the layers. Above this characteristic temperature, throughout the entire temperature range, the conductance becomes smaller than that of vacuum, due to the presence of partial band gap in most of the frequency range, as well as the suppression of evanescent tunneling between slabs at higher frequencies. Since the band structure, which controls the characteristic temperature, is directly controlled by the geometry of the crystal, the conductance of the structure becomes highly tunable. As an example, we show that the conductance of this system can be changed by nearly an order of magnitude simply by altering the thickness of the vacuum layers.

Figure 1.

As a starting point, we consider a photonic crystal described by a band structure omegaj(k), where omega is the photon frequency, k is the photon wavevector, and j is the band index which includes both polarizations. Assuming that the heat flows along the z direction, the thermal conductance per unit area is given by9

<i>G</i>(<i>T</i>) = [summation]<sub><i>j</i></sub>[integral]<sub><i>k</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> >= 0</sub>((<i>d</i><sup>3</sup><b>k</b>)/((2 <i>pi</i>)<sup>3</sup>))[h-bar] <i>omega</i><sub><i>j</i></sub>(<b>k</b>)|(([partial-derivative] <i>omega</i><sub><i>j</i></sub>(<b>k</b>))/([partial-derivative]<i>k</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>))|(([partial-derivative])/([partial-derivative]<i>T</i>))((1/(<i>e</i><sup>[h-bar] <i>omega</i><sub><i>j</i></sub>(<b>k</b>)/(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)</sup> − 1))).1

This equation represents a generalization of the one-dimensional result in Ref. 1. We note that

[summation]<sub><i>j</i></sub>[integral]<sub><i>k</i><sub><i>z</i></sub> >= 0</sub>((<i>d</i><sup>3</sup><b>k</b>)/((2 <i>pi</i>)<sup>3</sup>))|(([partial-derivative] <i>omega</i><sub><i>j</i></sub>)/([partial-derivative]<i>k</i><sub><i>z</i></sub>))|<i>f</i>(<i>omega</i><sub><i>j</i></sub>) = [integral]<sub>0</sub><sup>[infinity]</sup>((<i>d</i> <i>omega</i>)/(2 <i>pi</i>))<i>f</i>(<i>omega</i>)[[summation]<sub><i>m</i></sub>[integral]<sub>constant   <i>omega</i></sub>((<i>d</i><sup>2</sup><b>k</b><sub>||</sub>)/((2 <i>pi</i>)<sup>2</sup>))],2

where m labels all possible solutions of kz>0, including both polarizations, for a given pair of (omega,k||). Here, k|| is the wavevector component on the x-y plane (notice that m and the band index j are generally not the same). Equation (1) can be further simplified to yield

<i>G</i>(<i>T</i>) = <i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>[integral]<sub>0</sub><sup>[infinity]</sup>((<i>d</i> <i>omega</i>)/((2 <i>pi</i>)<sup>3</sup>))(([[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)]<sup>2</sup><i>e</i><sup>[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)</sup>)/([<i>e</i><sup>[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)</sup> − 1]<sup>2</sup>))<i>A</i>(<i>omega</i>),3

where

<i>A</i>(<i>omega</i>) [equivalent] [summation]<sub><i>m</i></sub>[integral]<sub>constant   <i>omega</i></sub><i>d</i><sup>2</sup><b>k</b><sub>||</sub>.4

At a constant frequency omega0, omega0=omegaj(k) describes constant frequency surfaces in k-space. A(omega=omega0) is the total projected area of such constant frequency surfaces onto the x-y plane and will be referred to as the “projected area” hereafter in this paper. A(omega) arises because photons are allowed to propagate in any direction. Thus, in three-dimensional structures, the dispersion relations of photons can play a significant role in determining thermal conductance. This is in contrast to one-dimensional structures such as nanowires where the carriers propagate strictly in one dimension. In one-dimensional systems, if one further assumes that there is only one mode that contributes to thermal conductance, at low enough temperature, the thermal conductance assumes a universal form (pik<sub><i>B</i></sub><sup>2</sup>T)/(6[h-bar]) that is independent of the dispersion relation.1

In order to highlight the effects of band structure on thermal conductance, below for most cases, we will normalize the conductance of the photonic crystals against that of vacuum. For vacuum in three dimensions, with omega(k)=c|k|, one has Avac(omega)=2pi(omega/c)2 and Gvac(T)=(pi2k<sub><i>B</i></sub><sup>4</sup>T3)/(15[h-bar]3c2). Note that Avac(omega) and Gvac(T) include contributions from both polarizations.

Using Eqs. (3),(4), we now consider the properties of thermal conductance of the multilayer structure shown in Fig. 1. We assume that the dielectric slabs in Fig. 1 are lossless, with a thickness of d1 and a refractive index n1=n. The vacuum layer has a thickness d2 and a refractive index n2=1. a=d1+d2 is the periodicity. For such a multilayer geometry, for each value of (omega,k||), there are two independent polarization modes: the s-polarized mode, with electric field along the direction of <b>z</b>-hat ×k||/k|| and the p-polarized mode, with magnetic field along the direction of <b>z</b>-hat ×k||/k||. Here, k|| is conserved in all layers and k||=|k|||. The dispersion relations for both polarizations are given by10

cos(<i>k</i><sub><i>z</i></sub><i>a</i>) = cos(<i>gamma</i><sub>1</sub><i>d</i><sub>1</sub>)cos(<i>gamma</i><sub>2</sub><i>d</i><sub>2</sub>)−(1/2)(((<i>gamma</i><sub>1</sub>)/(<i>P</i><sub><i>zeta</i></sub><i>gamma</i><sub>2</sub>))+((<i>P</i><sub><i>zeta</i></sub><i>gamma</i><sub>2</sub>)/(<i>gamma</i><sub>1</sub>)))sin(<i>gamma</i><sub>1</sub><i>d</i><sub>1</sub>)sin(<i>gamma</i><sub>2</sub><i>d</i><sub>2</sub>).5

Here, gammai=1,2=sqrt((<i>n</i><sub><i>i</i></sub><i>omega</i> /<i>c</i>)<sup>2</sup> − <i>k</i><sub>||</sub><sup>2</sup>). Ps=1 and Pp=n2 for the s- and p-polarized fields, respectively. At any given omega, a real solution for kz represents a Bloch state of propagating mode of the photons. These solutions of (omega,k||,kz) define the photonic bands. The collection of all Bloch states in the omega-k|| plane defines the projected band diagram.10 As an example, the projected band diagram for s polarization is shown in Fig. 2(a). The refractive index of the slab is taken as n=sqrt(12), which approximates the refractive index of silicon at infrared frequencies and at room temperature.

Figure 2.

In the projected band diagram, the Bloch states exist only in the region k||<=nomega/c, i.e., only in the region below the light line of the dielectric. Among all Bloch states of the system, the states in the region below the vacuum light line (i.e., k||<=omega/c) are extended in both the dielectrics and vacuum. The states in the region between the vacuum and the dielectric light lines (i.e., omega/c<=k||<=nomega/c) are extended in the dielectrics but evanescent in vacuum.

With the projected band diagram as defined by Eq. (5), one can compute the projected area A(omega) using Eq. (4). Figure 2(b) shows the projected area As(omega) for s-polarized modes, normalized with respect to Avac(omega)=2pi(omega/c)2. Here, As(omega)=2pi[summation]m[integral]<sub><i>k</i><sub><i>m</i>,<i>s</i></sub><sup>(1)</sup>(<i>omega</i>)</sub><sup><i>k</i><sub><i>m</i>,<i>s</i></sub><sup>(2)</sup>(<i>omega</i>)</sup>k||dk||, where k<sub><i>m</i>,<i>s</i></sub><sup>(1)</sup>(omega) and k<sub><i>m</i>,<i>s</i></sub><sup>(2)</sup>(omega) are the minimum and maximum values of k|| of the mth s-polarized band at omega. Since Avac(omega) contains contributions from both polarizations, for vacuum As(omega)/Avac(omega)=1/2. For the crystal, at omega-->0,

((<i>A</i><sub><i>s</i></sub>(<i>omega</i>))/(<i>A</i><sub>vac</sub>(<i>omega</i>))) = (1/2)((<i>n</i><sub>1</sub><sup>2</sup><i>d</i><sub>1</sub> + <i>n</i><sub>2</sub><sup>2</sup><i>d</i><sub>2</sub>)/(<i>d</i><sub>1</sub> + <i>d</i><sub>2</sub>)) > (1/2),

as shown in Fig. 2(b). The photonic crystal thus behaves as a uniform medium with an effective dielectric constant. In contrast, over the entire high frequency range [Fig. 2(b)], As(omega)/Avac(omega)<1/2. As the frequency increases, the bandwidth of the modes above the vacuum light line (k||>omega/c) becomes progressively smaller. These modes are evanescent in vacuum and as the frequency increases, the evanescent decay lengths in vacuum approach zero [Fig. 2(a)]. Consequently, their contributions to As(omega) gradually vanish. Below the vacuum light line (k||<omega/c), partial band gaps persist. Thus, As(omega)/Avac(omega)<1/2 in the high frequency region. The transition between the low and high frequency behavior typically occurs within the first band gap, provided that at a frequency in this gap, the evanescent lengths in vacuum of the modes become comparable to the thickness of the vacuum layer. The p polarization and, hence, A(omega)[equivalent]As(omega)+Ap(omega), exhibit the same transition behaviors from low to high frequency region.

Having obtained A(omega), we now calculate G(T) using Eq. (3). The result, normalized with respect to Gvac(T), is shown in Fig. 3, along with the respective contributions from s and p polarizations. The curve of G(T)/Gvac(T) as a function of T generally follows the shape of the curve A(omega)/Avac(omega) in omega, with fluctuations smoothened by averaging over the energy distribution of photons. The total normalized thermal conductance of the structure G(T)/Gvac(T) (black solid curve) is much larger than 1 at low temperatures and decreases to a value smaller than 1 at higher temperatures. This transition can be understood from the behavior of A(omega). At low temperature, most photons populate a small bandwidth of frequency from omega=0, where A(omega)/Avac(omega)>1, thus, G(T)/Gvac(T)>1. At high temperature, photons spread over to a wide range of frequency, where A(omega)/Avac(omega)<1. As a result, G(T)/Gvac(T)<1. Thus, photonic crystals can be used to generate a medium with total thermal conductance significantly below that of the vacuum.

Figure 3.

Since the band structure is directly determined by geometry, the use of photonic crystal provides a mechanism to drastically tune the thermal conductance at a constant temperature. As an example, we vary the vacuum spacing between the dielectric slabs for the structure shown in Fig. 1. Increasing the spacing decreases the frequency of the first band gap. Consequently, one could tune the structure from G<Gvac to G>Gvac at selected temperatures. As an example, in Fig. 4, we plot the total thermal conductance as a function of T for d2=9d1, d1, and 0.111d1. In this parameter range of d2, with fixed thickness d1 of the dielectric slab, the total thermal conductance decreases as the spacing d2 increases. In particular, when the operating temperature is at Ta=0.02hc/(kBd1), the increase of d2 results in the decrease of total thermal conductance by more than an order of magnitude (as shown by the inset in Fig. 4).

Figure 4.

To observe the coherent photon thermal transport effects predicted in this paper, we note that the frequency range of integration in Eq. (3) is set by the function

<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub>(([[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)]<sup>2</sup><i>e</i><sup>[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)</sup>)/([<i>e</i><sup>[h-bar] <i>omega</i> /(<i>k</i><sub><i>B</i></sub><i>T</i>)</sup> − 1]<sup>2</sup>)),

which approximately vanishes at [h-bar]omega>10kBT. Thus, at a given temperature T, the material chosen needs to be transparent in the energy range (0,10kBT). For temperature at 300  K, this range is (0,0.259  eV). We note that intrinsic silicon in fact is transparent in this entire range11 because optical phonon in silicon is not optically active. Using silicon as the dielectric layer to observe the tunable thermal conduction effect, as plotted in Fig. 4, we can choose d1=1  µm. The choice of the temperature Ta that has large tunability then corresponds to 288  K. Thus, such an effect can be potentially observed at room temperature.

REFERENCES


Citation links [e.g., Phys. Rev. D 40, 2172 (1989)] go to online journal abstracts. Other links (see Reference Information) are available with your current login. Navigation of links may be more efficient using a second browser window.
  1. K. Schwab, E. A. Henriksen, J. M. Worlock, and M. L. Roukes, Nature (London) 404, 974 (2000). [MEDLINE] first citation in article
  2. L. G. C. Rego and G. Kirczenow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 232 (1998). first citation in article
  3. T. Yamamoto, S. Watanabe, and K. Watanabe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 075502 (2004). [ISI] [MEDLINE] first citation in article
  4. G. Chen, J. Heat Transfer 121, 945 (1999). first citation in article
  5. M. V. Simkin and G. D. Mahan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 927 (2000). [MEDLINE] first citation in article
  6. A. N. Cleland, D. R. Schmidt, and C. S. Yung, Phys. Rev. B 64, 172301 (2001). first citation in article
  7. M. Meschke, W. Guichard, and J. P. Pekola, Nature (London) 444, 187 (2006). [MEDLINE] first citation in article
  8. D. R. Schmidt, R. J. Schoelkopf, and A. N. Cleland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 045901 (2004). [ISI] [MEDLINE] first citation in article
  9. J. Ziman, Electrons and Phonons (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1960). first citation in article
  10. A. Yariv and P. Yeh, Photonics: Optical Electronics in Modern Communications, 6th ed. (Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 2007). first citation in article
  11. E. D. Palik, Handbook of Optical Constants of Solids (Academic, New York, 1985), p. 554. first citation in article

FIGURES


Full figure (9 kB)

Fig. 1. (Color online) Schematic of the geometry. Gray layers are dielectric slabs. The slabs are separated by vacuum. First citation in article


Full figure (37 kB)

Fig. 2. (Color online) (a) The projected band diagram for the s-polarized modes for the structure shown in Fig. 1, with d1=0.5a. The bands in the region 0<k||<omega/c are drawn in brown and those in the region omega/c<k||<nomega/c are drawn in green. The vacuum k||=omega/c and the material k||=nomega/c light lines are also shown. The inset shows the projection of the constant frequency surface on the x-y plane for omega=0.61(2pic/a). (b) The blue line shows As(omega)/Avac(omega) for s polarization. The brown and green lines represent the contributions in the range 0<k||<omega/c and omega/c<k||<nomega/c, respectively. (c) The black, blue, and red lines are the total A(omega), As(omega), and Ap(omega), respectively, as normalized to Avac(omega). First citation in article


Full figure (20 kB)

Fig. 3. (Color online) Normalized radiative thermal conductance G(T)/Gvac(T) for the structure shown in Fig. 1 with d1=0.5a. The contributions of s-polarized (blue curve) and p-polarized (red curve) modes are summed to give the total conductance (black curve). The inset shows a wider range of temperature. First citation in article


Full figure (16 kB)

Fig. 4. (Color online) Normalized radiative thermal conductance G(T)/Gvac(T) as one varies slab separation d2. The temperature of Ta=0.02hc/(kBd1), where significant variation as a function of d2 occurs, is indicated as a vertical dotted line. The inset shows G(T)/Gvac(T) at Ta=0.02hc/(kBd1), as d2 varies continuously from d2=0.111d1 to d2=9d1. First citation in article

FOOTNOTES

aElectronic mail: wlau@stanford.edu.

bElectronic mail: shanhui@stanford.edu.


Up: Issue Table of Contents
Go to: Previous Article | Next Article
Other formats: HTML (smaller files) | PDF (326 kB)