1 "Incidentally, I despise everything which merely instructs me without 
            increasing or immediately enlivening my activity." These are Goethe's 
            words. With them, as with a heartfelt expression of Ceterum censeo 
            [I judge otherwise],(1) our consideration of the worth and the worthlessness 
            of history may begin. For this work is to set down why, in the spirit 
            of Goethe's saying, we must seriously despise instruction without 
            vitality, knowledge which enervates activity, and history as an expensive 
            surplus of knowledge and a luxury, because we lack what is still most 
            essential to us and because what is superfluous is hostile to what 
            is essential. To be sure, we need history. But we need it in a manner 
            different from the way in which the spoilt idler in the garden of 
            knowledge uses it, no matter how elegantly he may look down on our 
            coarse and graceless needs and distresses. That is, we need it for 
            life and action, not for a comfortable turning away from life and 
            action or merely for glossing over the egotistical life and the cowardly 
            bad act. We wish to use history only insofar as it serves living. 
            But there is a degree of doing history and a valuing of it through 
            which life atrophies and degenerates. To bring this phenomenon to 
            light as a remarkable symptom of our time is every bit as necessary 
            as it may be painful.
          2 I have tried to describe a feeling which has often enough tormented 
            me. I take my revenge on this feeling when I expose it to the general 
            public. Perhaps with such a description someone or other will have 
            reason to point out to me that he also knows this particular sensation 
            but that I have not felt it with sufficient purity and naturalness 
            and definitely have not expressed myself with the appropriate certainty 
            and mature experience. Perhaps one or two will respond in this way. 
            However, most people will tell me that this feeling is totally wrong, 
            unnatural, abominable, and absolutely forbidden, that with it, in 
            fact, I have shown myself unworthy of the powerful historical tendency 
            of the times, as it has been, by common knowledge, observed for the 
            past two generations, particularly among the Germans. Whatever the 
            reaction, now that I dare to expose myself with this natural description 
            of my feeling, common decency will be fostered rather than shamed, 
            because I am providing many opportunities for a contemporary tendency 
            like the reaction just mentioned to make polite pronouncements. Moreover, 
            I obtain for myself something of even more value to me than respectability: 
            I become publicly instructed and set straight about our times.
          3. This essay is also out of touch with the times because here I 
            am trying for once to see as a contemporary disgrace, infirmity, and 
            defect something of which our age is justifiably proud, its historical 
            culture. For I believe, in fact, that we are all suffering from a 
            consumptive historical fever and at the very least should recognize 
            that we are afflicted with it. If Goethe with good reason said that 
            with our virtues we simultaneously cultivate our faults and if, as 
            everyone knows, a hypertrophic virtue (as the historical sense of 
            our age appears to me to be) can serve to destroy a people just as 
            well as a hypertrophic vice, then people may make allowance for me 
            this once. Also in my defense I should not conceal the fact that the 
            experiences which aroused these feelings of torment in me I have derived 
            for the most part from myself and only from others for the purpose 
            of comparison and that, insofar as I am a student more of ancient 
            times, particularly the Greeks, I come as a child in these present 
            times to such anachronistic experiences concerning myself. But I must 
            be allowed to ascribe this much to myself on account of my profession 
            as a classical philologue, for I would not know what sense classical 
            philology would have in our age unless it is to be effective by its 
            inappropriateness for the times, that is, in opposition to the age, 
            thus working on the age, and, we hope, for the benefit of a coming 
            time.
          1. Allusion to Cato's "Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam" 
            (I judge otherwise that Carthage be destroyed) with whcih he used 
            to conclude all of his speeches until he finally convinced the Romans 
            to take up the Third Punic War. Goethe's words from a letter from 
            him to Freidrich Schiller (19 Dec. 1798).