Structural Chromosome Rearrangments

 

 

Autosomal reciprocal translocations

Robertsonian Translocations

X-autosome translocations

Y-autosome translocations

X-Y translocations

3-way exchange

 

Inversions

 

Deletions

Duplications

Inversion Duplications

Isochromosomes

Ring chromosomes

Marker Chromosomes

 

Insertions

 

 

Epidemiology and Etiology:

·         75% of de novo structural chromosome rearrangements are paternally derived

·         May be due to number of mitotic divisions

·         May be male gametogenesis is more sensitive to mutagens than oogenesis

·         Exceptions to this rule:

·         De novo nonhomologous Robertsonian translocations (90% maternal)

·         Terminal chromosome 1 short arm deletions (80% maternal)

·         Several supernumerary isochromosomes

·         Inverted duplicated chromosomes

·         Interstitial microdeletions associated with NAHR (no parental bias)

·         Rarely seen in mosaic form:

·         Exceptions are rings and dicentric chromosomes (mitotically unstable)

·         Regions of the genome that are more susceptible to breakage and rearrangement:

·         DNA sequences that are repeated elsewhere in the genome

·         Fragile sites

·         Tandem repeat sequences

·         Note: usually no repeat expansion found

·         Does not explain all fragile sites

·         May be due to delayed +/- incomplete DNA replication

·         Particular secondary DNA structures

·         Mechanisms:

·         Homologous recombination (HR) is predominant pathway underlying recurrent rearrangements in our genome

·         Non-allelic homologous recombination (NAHR):

·         Paralogous DNA sequences misaligning during meiosis

·         High copy number repeats:

·         Alu

·         Satellite DNA

·         Low-copy repeats (segmental duplications)

·         In mice, requires a minimal amount of 132 to 232 bp of perfectly shared sequence

·         “hotspots” of HR are seen in both non-allelic and allelic HR

·         Clustering within small (< 1 kb) genomic regions

·         Coincidence with apparent gene conversion events

·         No obvious sequence similarities between hotspots (as opposed to prokaryotes)

·         Occurring between homologs or sister chromatids

·         Results in reciprocally imbalanced recombinant products

·         Intrachromosomal recombination (occurring within the same chromosome)

·         Results in a deletion with no reciprocally duplicated partner

·         (the other product is an acentric ring)

·         About equal proportions from mothers and fathers

·         Male heterozygotes for Bloom syndrome have a high frequency of (sperm) chromosome breaks

·         Types of recurring structural rearrangements:

·         Duplications (direct orientation on same chromosome)

·         Deletions (direct orientation on same chromosome)

·         Inversions (inverted orientation on same chromosome) (ex. pericentric inversion 9)

·         Translocations (any orientation on different chromosome) (ex. t(4;8)(p16;p23))

·         Robertsonian translocations

·         Isochromosomes

·         Marker chromosomes

·         May be:

·         Involving a single gene (ex. DMD, hemophilia A)

·         Involving multiple genes (microdeletion and microduplication syndromes)

·         Non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ):

·         Likely mechanism for non-recurrent genomic rearrangements

·         Two broken ends are simply pieced together

·         Sometimes after limited processing of ends

·         Quick, but error-prone, repair

·         Ku complex:

·         Initially recognizes DNA break

·         DNA end binding

·         protein kinase DNA-PKcs

·         signals presence of the break

·         activates repair proteins

·         DNA-end processing enzymes

·         XRCC4–Ligase IV complex

·         re-ligates the broken DNA ends

·         Note that breakpoints often map to LCRs, but  the  two breakpoints may be different LCRs

·         Homologous repair (HR):

·         More accurate

·         Information is copied from an intact homologous DNA duplex

·         Requirement of specific cell cycle phases (S/G2)

·         Fragile sites:

·         Likely minimal involvement in most chromosomal rearrangements

·         Paucity of data suggesting their role

·         secondary DNA structures:

·         hairpin-shaped secondary structures predicted to be formed by AT-rich palindromic sequences

·         DNA sequences that contain two inverted regions complementary to each other

·         Susceptible to nucleases that produce double-stranded breaks

·         Implicated in recurring t(11;22), and one other translocation, a t(17;22) in a family with NF type I

·         DNA double-stranded breaks (DSB):

·         Intrinsic sources:

·         Products of cellular metabolism

·         Reactive oxygen species (ROS)

·         Programmed DSBs:

·         V(D)J recombination in B cells

·         Replication fork passes through a template with a nick

·         Estimated 10-100 DSBs per nucleus per day

·         Extrinsic sources:

·         X-rays / gamma-rays

·         Chemotherapeutic drugs

·         Repair process may be error-prone

·         DNA repair process:

·         Cell cycle arrest

·         Apoptosis maybe

·         Homologous repair:

·         Only during S/G2 phases of cell cycle (sister chromatid present)

·         NHEJ:

·         Any phase in the cell cycle

·         Predominant repair pathway in mammalian cells

 

Common sites:

·          

 

Gross features:

·          

 

Histologic features:

·          

 

Immunophenotype:

Marker:

Sensitivity:

Specificity:

 

 

 

 

Molecular features:

·          

 

Other features:

·          

 

References:

·         Gersen SL, Keagle MB. The Principles of Clinical Cytogenetics. 2nd ed. Humana Press; 2004:616.

·         Lupski JR, Stankiewicz P. Genomic disorders: molecular mechanisms for rearrangements and conveyed phenotypes. PLoS Genet. 2005;1(6):e49.